In my previous blog post, I discussed the economics of
irrigation development in Africa. The aim of that blog was to identify the factors
influencing the feasibility of irrigation in a given area. Today, in this blog,
I would like to explore the various types of irrigation that exist in Africa with
reference to case studies.
Irrigation by definition is the artificial application of
water to land to produce crops[1]. Although irrigation has
developed over the years due to modernisation and advances in technology, some
farmers still use traditional approaches. This is due to these methods being
reliable and relatively inexpensive. Examples of traditional irrigation methods
include water harvesting, flood plain irrigation, swamp irrigation and
groundwater irrigation.
Water harvesting is a method that has been used extensively
for centuries. Rainwater is collected and channelled into a small growing area.
An area where water harvesting is heavily used in the lowlands of Tanzania
where rainfall is between 600 – 900mm and run off naturally collects at the
bottom of the valleys. This provides optimal conditions for paddy rice
cultivation and research shows that this system contributes to 35% of the total
rice production in Tanzania [FAO,2001]. Figure 1 shows the tanks used for rainwater
harvesting in Tanzania.
Figure 1 shows the tank used for rainwater harvesting in Tanzania. [Source] |
Groundwater irrigation, unlike water harvesting, uses water
within the Earth, in the form of medium to deep aquifers. It is believed that
the use of groundwater will alleviate seasonal water scarcity as it is a reliable
water resource that is less susceptible to evaporation and contamination in comparison
to surface water resources.
In areas such as southwest Egypt, groundwater irrigation is ideal
due to the region’s aridity and lack of surface water. The Nubian Sandstone
Aquifer System within this region has a reasonable amount of groundwater that
is being heavily exploited by surrounding inhabitants. Results from research conducted
by Ebraheem, 2003 indicate that large-scale irrigation cannot be supported in
this area as the annual recharge of the aquifer is too low. Ebraheem further
stated that the present value of extraction must decrease from 203 million m3
yr-1 to 93 million m3 yr-1 to avoid
depletion.
In contrast to traditional methods of irrigation, modern technologies
are costly and usually require the presence of a specialist upon construction
and installation which may incur additional charges. The High Aswan Dam is an example
of a full control dam built to provide sufficient water for agricultural and other
purposes. The dam was built on the border between Egypt and Sudan, successfully
ceasing floods and droughts in regions around the Nile River. Figure 2 shows
the location of the dam along the Nile River. The dam supplies Egypt’s annual
quota of 55.5 milliard cubic meters of water and has been effective in doing so
since 1970. However, the cost of construction neared $1 billion which cannot be
afforded by rural farmers and smaller countries with lower GDP.
Figure 2 shows the location of the High Aswan Dam along the Nile River. [Source] |
Although modern technologies may seem disadvantageous, the benefits
in some cases outweigh the negatives. For example, modern technology such as
motor-driven pumps can be used to reduce the drudgery of lifting water. This is
will increase the efficiency of farming thus, allowing more plants to be grown
over a larger area. In addition, distribution technologies such as trickle
sprinkle irrigation and piped water supplies will aid the reduction of water
wastage. Water can be fed directly to the root of the plant at regular
intervals, allowing optimal root moisture to be maintained. This will reduce the
stress on the plant, enabling the maximum growth rate, therefore increasing the
profits made by farmers. Despite perennial irrigation providing new opportunities
for more intensive crop cultivation, issues may build up in the long run, reducing
the efficiency of production. These include waterlogging, salt builds up in the
soil and fluctuations in the water table [El Gamal F, 2000].
Due to the global market, the prices of cereal crops have
dropped over the years, meaning it would be unreasonable for a small-holder
farmer to invest in costly, large-scale irrigation infrastructure. I believe it
would be more ideal to use modern technology that has been modified to become
low-cost such as a treadle pump. This compromise will ensure the farmer makes
enough money for a living as well as increasing the efficiency of their food
production.
Overall, I think the use of irrigation for crop production
is beneficial, especially in areas with variable rainfall and an arid climate.
However, the type of irrigation used must be suited to the growing area and the
farmers income.
No comments:
Post a Comment